Sunday, 7 October 2012

A service with passover foods

Gathering


My people, hear my teaching; listen to the words of my mouth. I will open my mouth with a parable; I will utter hidden things, things from of old - things we have heard and known, things our ancestors have told us. We will not hide them from their descendants; we will tell the next generation the praiseworthy deeds of the Lord, his power, and the wonders he has done

(Psalm 78. 1-4)

 

Readings from Exodus and tastings


1.8 Then a new king,...came to power in Egypt. “Look,” he said to his people, “the Israelites have become far too numerous for us. Come, we must deal shrewdly with them or they will become even more numerous and, if war breaks out, will join our enemies, fight against us and leave the country.”


So they put slave masters over them to oppress them with forced labor... But the more they were oppressed, the more they multiplied and spread; so the Egyptians came to dread the Israelites and worked them ruthlessly. They made their lives bitter with harsh labor in brick and mortar and with all kinds of work in the fields; in all their harsh labor the Egyptians worked them ruthlessly.


3.7 Then the Lord said, “I have indeed seen the misery of my people in Egypt. I have heard them crying out because of their slave drivers, and I am concerned about their suffering. So I have come down to rescue them from the hand of the Egyptians and to bring them up out of that land into a good and spacious land, a land flowing with milk and honey.


12.1. The Lord said to Moses and Aaron in Egypt, “This month is to be for you the first month, the first month of your year. Tell the whole community of Israel that on the tenth day of this month each man is to take a lamb for his family, one for each household.


“The animals you choose must be year-old males without defect, and you may take them from the sheep or the goats. Take care of them until the fourteenth day of the month, when all the members of the community of Israel must slaughter them at twilight.


22 “Take a bunch of hyssop dip it into the blood in the basin and put some of the blood on the top and on both sides of the doorframe.



First tasting: parsley dipped in salt water


(Parsley symbolises the hyssop, the salt water symbolises the blood.)




8. “That same night they are to eat the meat roasted over the fire, along with bitter herbs and bread without yeast.

  

 

 Second tasting: horseradish dipped in charoseth


(The horseradish represents the bitter herbs, the charoseth symbolised the mud the Israelites used to make bricks and mortar in Egypt.)



8. “That same night they are to eat the meat roasted over the fire, along with bitter herbs and bread without yeast.


“Do not eat the meat raw or boiled in water, but roast it over a fire with the head, legs and internal organs. Do not leave any of it till morning; if some is left till morning, you must burn it. This is how you are to eat it: with your cloak tucked into your belt, your sandals on your feet and your staff in your hand. Eat it in haste; it is the Lord’s Passover.


“On that same night I will pass through Egypt and strike down every firstborn of both people and animals, and I will bring judgment on all the gods of Egypt. I am the Lord. The blood will be a sign for you on the houses where you are, and when I see the blood, I will pass over you.


14. “This is a day you are to commemorate; for the generations to come you shall celebrate it as a festival to the Lord - a lasting ordinance. For seven days you are to eat bread made without yeast.


Third tasting: unleavened bread***




17. “Celebrate the Festival of Unleavened Bread, because it was on this very day that I brought your divisions out of Egypt. Celebrate this day as a lasting ordinance for the generations to come.


24 “Obey these instructions as a lasting ordinance for you and your descendants. When you enter the land that the Lord will give you as he promised, observe this ceremony. And when your children ask you, ‘What does this ceremony mean to you?’ then tell them, ‘It is the Passover sacrifice to the Lord, who passed over the houses of the Israelites in Egypt and spared our homes when he struck down the Egyptians.’”


A reading from 1 Corinthians


5.7b Don’t you know that a little yeast leavens the whole batch of dough? Get rid of the old yeast, so that you may be a new unleavened batch - as you really are. For Christ, our Passover lamb, has been sacrificed. Therefore let us keep the Festival, not with the old bread leavened with malice and wickedness, but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth.


Conclusion

Give thanks to the Lord, for he is good.
All: His love endures forever.

Give thanks to the God of gods.
All: His love endures forever.

Give thanks to the Lord of lords:
All: His love endures forever.

to him who struck down the firstborn of Egypt
All: His love endures forever.

and brought Israel out from among them
All: His love endures forever.

with a mighty hand and outstretched arm;
All: His love endures forever.

to him who led his people through the wilderness;
All: His love endures forever.

He remembered us in our low estate
All: His love endures forever.

and freed us from our enemies.
All: His love endures forever.

He gives food to every creature.
All: His love endures forever.

Give thanks to the God of heaven.
All: His love endures forever.

(Psalm 136. 1-3, 10-12, 16, 23-26)


* Sprigs of parsley + a bowl of salty water
** Sticks of horseradish + a bowl of charoseth (100g/4oz of walnuts, a large cooking apple peeled, cored and sliced, 1 tsp sugar, 2tsps cinnamon, red wine.  Blend the walnuts, apple, sugar and cinnamon in a mixer then moisten with red wine.)
*** Matzos broken into pieces

A service with fruit

Gathering


Leader: “Come, all you who are thirsty, come to the waters; and you who have no money, come, buy and eat! Come, buy wine and milk without money and without cost. Why spend money on what is not bread, and your labor on what does not satisfy? Listen, listen to me, and eat what is good, and you will delight in the richest of fare.”

(Isaiah 55: 1-2)


Readings from the Song of Songs and tastings


Part 1: First voice (She)

 

First reading: 7: 10-12

I belong to my beloved, and his desire is for me. Come, my beloved, let us go to the countryside, let us spend the night in the villages. Let us go early to the vineyards to see if the vines have budded, if their blossoms have opened, and if the pomegranates are in bloom there I will give you my love.

Second reading: 2: 2-4 

Like an apricot tree among the trees of the forest is my beloved among the young men. I delight to sit in his shade, and his fruit is sweet to my taste. Let him lead me to the banquet hall, and let his banner over me be love.


First tasting: apricot*


 

Third reading: 2: 5-6

Strengthen me with raisins, refresh me with apricots, for I am faint with love. His left hand is under my head, and his right arm embraced me.

 

Second tasting: raisin**


 

 

 

 

 

Fourth reading: 4: 16

Awake, north wind, and come, south wind! Blow on my garden, that its fragrance may spread everywhere. Let my beloved come into his garden and taste its choice fruits.



Part 2: Second voice (He)


Fifth reading: 2: 10 -13

Arise, my darling, my beautiful one, come with me. See! The winter is past; the rains are over and gone. Flowers appear on the earth; the season of singing has come, the cooing of doves is heard in our land. The fig tree forms its early fruit; the blossoming vines spread their fragrance. Arise, come, my darling; my beautiful one, come with me

 

 

Third tasting: fig***


 

Sixth reading: 4: 12-15

You are a garden locked up, my sister, my bride; you are a spring enclosed, a sealed fountain. Your plants are an orchard of pomegranates with choice fruits, with henna and nard, nard and saffron, calamus and cinnamon, with every kind of incense tree, with myrrh and aloes and all the finest spices. You are a garden fountain, a well of flowing water streaming down from Lebanon.


 

Fourth tasting: pomegranate***






Seventh reading: 5: 1

I have come into my garden, my sister, my bride; I have gathered my myrrh with my spice. I have eaten my honeycomb and my honey; I have drunk my wine and my milk. Eat, friends, and drink; drink your fill of love.


Conclusion


Leader: God of life and love
All: We rejoice in your abundant gifts

Leader: God of all peoples and all places
All: We celebrate your generosity and grace

Leader: God of the earth and the heavens
All: We praise you for your provision

Leader: God of life and love
All: We bless your holy name

Amen.



* Apricots cut into slices (eighths)
** Raisins in a bowl
*** Figs cut into slices (eighths)
**** Pomengranate seeds in a bowl






A service with wine

Prayer of Preparation


Almighty God,
As we gather here to taste of your suffering and goodness,
Help us to remember your death and resurrection,
And help us to look for the new wine of your kingdom
All: Amen.

Readings and tastings


First reading: Mark 14: 23-25

And [Jesus] took a cup, and when he had given thanks he gave it to them, and they all drank of it. And he said to them, "This is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many. Truly, I say to you, I shall not drink again of the fruit of the vine until that day when I drink it new in the kingdom of God."

 

Second reading: Mark 14: 32-36

And they went to a place which was called Gethsem'ane; and [Jesus] said to his disciples, "Sit here, while I pray." And he took with him Peter and James and John, and began to be greatly distressed and troubled. And he said to them, "My soul is very sorrowful, even to death; remain here, and watch." And going a little farther, he fell on the ground and prayed that, if it were possible, the hour might pass from him. And he said, "Abba, Father, all things are possible to thee; remove this cup from me; yet not what I will, but what thou wilt."

Third reading: Mark 15: 22-24a

And they brought [Jesus] to the place called Gol'gotha (which means the place of a skull). And they offered him wine mingled with myrrh; but he did not take it. And they crucified him.

 

First tasting: diluted red wine vinegar *

 

Fourth reading: John 2: 1-10

On the third day there was a marriage at Cana in Galilee, and the mother of Jesus was there; Jesus also was invited to the marriage, with his disciples. When the wine failed, the mother of Jesus said to him, "They have no wine." And Jesus said to her, "O woman, what have you to do with me? My hour has not yet come." His mother said to the servants, "Do whatever he tells you."

Now six stone jars were standing there, for the Jewish rites of purification, each holding twenty or thirty gallons. Jesus said to them, "Fill the jars with water." And they filled them up to the brim. He said to them, "Now draw some out, and take it to the steward of the feast." So they took it.

When the steward of the feast tasted the water now become wine, and did not know where it came from (though the servants who had drawn the water knew), the steward of the feast called the bridegroom and said to him, "Every man serves the good wine first; and when men have drunk freely, then the poor wine; but you have kept the good wine until now."

Fifth reading:  Mark 2: 19-20 and 22

And Jesus said to them, "Can the wedding guests fast while the bridegroom is with them? As long as they have the bridegroom with them, they cannot fast. The days will come, when the bridegroom is taken away from them, and then they will fast in that day. ...No one puts new wine into old wineskins; if he does, the wine will burst the skins, and the wine is lost, and so are the skins; but new wine is for fresh skins."

 

Second tasting: desert wine

 

Conclusion


All praise to you our God and Father
For you have quenched our thirst from the true vine:
Hear our prayer that, being grafted into Christ,
We may grow together in unity
And feast with him in his holy kingdom;
Through Jesus Christ our Lord
All: Amen.


* A good red wine vinegar diluted 1:1 with water
** A good desert wine such as Tokaji
Provide in individual shot glasses.

Monday, 30 July 2012

Heaven 2

St Matthew’s Church, Oxford, 15th July 2012.

Two weeks ago at the 10.30 service at St Matthew’s I preached a sermon on heaven.   I have since come to think that sermon was mistaken or at least inadequate.   I have come to this conclusion because of feed-back from people who heard the sermon and also from discussions with people about heaven over the last couple of weeks.  

In my previous sermon I sought to answer three questions about heaven: ‘Does it exist?’, ‘What is it like?’ and, ‘Are we going there?’    I spent most time on the second question, ‘What is it like?’   I am not now sure these are the right questions to ask about heaven.   I am somewhat chastened by a parable Charlie Bond told us last Sunday at the 10.30 service.   This parable goes something like this.  

A traveller meets an angel carrying a bunch of keys and a bucket of water.  The traveller asks the angel what he is going to do with the keys and the water.   The angel tells the traveller that, with the keys he is going to lock the doors of heaven, and with the bucket of water he will douse the fires of hell.  ‘But why? ‘ asks the traveller.  The angel replies, ‘Well then we will really see who loves God’.

And this parable is echoed in the collect for today:   I’ll read it again. 

‘O God who has prepared for those who love you such good things as pass our understanding: pour into our hearts such love toward you that we, loving you above all things, may obtain your promises, which exceed all that we can desire; through Jesus Christ our Lord.’

In other words we cannot have a complete answer to my second question two weeks ago, ‘What is heaven like?’ because it ‘passes our understanding’.   But I don’t think this means we cannot understand what heave is like at all, just that it is much bigger and better than we can understand.  

Moreover this collect – echoing the parable – also makes it clear that our primary desire should not be to understand what heaven is, or is going to be, like but to love God ‘above all things’ even heaven –or rather  especially heaven.   And that we should pray for this love rather than any understanding of heaven.

My answer to the question, ‘What is heaven like?’ a couple of weeks ago – perhaps for the best of motives– was ‘we cannot be sure’.   I thought we couldn’t be sure because at the time I thought there wasn’t much in the Bible about heaven but now I think I was wrong: there is a lot in the Bible about heaven.   Jesus talks about himself as coming from heaven – referring to himself as the Son of Man – as in visions from the book of Daniel - and proceeds to tell us many stories of heaven: they are called parables.    Jesus begins many of these parables with the words ‘the kingdom of heaven is like this’.  

Now you might object at this point that, when Jesus talks about the kingdom of heaven or the kingdom of God (as he calls it in Mark’s and Luke’s gospels), he is not primarily talking about somewhere we go to after our death but God’s reign, his sovereignty here on earth.   But to this I would say, one of the main things we do know about heaven – and I did say this two weeks ago - is that it is a place and time where God is and reigns.  So I am certain that we can learn more about heaven from looking at what Jesus says about the kingdom of heaven.  

So what can we learn of heaven from looking at Jesus’ parables of the kingdom.  Well lots but perhaps the first thing to say is that when Jesus talks about the kingdom of heaven he suggests that it’s both here now and yet to come.   This implies that, at least to some extent, heaven can be grasped or at least glimpsed here and now.   This seems to me an important aspect of heaven: it transcends time and space.   This was again something I touched on in my previous sermon.   I realise that some people feel that here and now their lives are more like hell than heaven, and to talk about grasping or glimpsing heaven here and now takes away some of the hope of a better future, but I don’t think we can get away from the fact that time and place are fairly, but not utterly, meaningless concepts when it comes to heaven.  

The parables are not primarily about the location of heaven in time and space.   Their importance does not lie in that they are set in first century Palestine but that they are stories for everywhere and for all time.  

The parables tell us about God’s justice in heaven: a different sort of justice to that we have become accustomed.   Think here about the parable of the labourers in the vineyard who get paid the same however long they work.   But they also speak of judgement – a judgement that puts things right and is less harsh than our judgement of ourselves.  Think here about the parable of the wheat and tares. 

They tell of freedom from prejudicial assumptions and the restoration of human relationships based on a shared humanity rather than relationships based on a common nationality, race or even religion.   Think here of the parable of the Good Samaritan.  

They tell of forgiveness and of healing of what has gone before.   Think here of the parables of the lost sheep, lost coin and lost son (more commonly known as the parable of the Prodigal Son).

They speak of celebration and sheer joy. Think again of the parables of the lost sheep, lost coin and lost son but also the many stories of banquets and feasts to which all are invited regardless of power, wealth or status.   .

And if it is true that Jesus talks about heaven through his parables might it not also be the case that he demonstrates heaven through his miracles?   The miracles are enacted parables.   That is they are not done like magic tricks to amaze or to demonstrates Jesus’ power.   The can be viewed as foretastes of heaven: where storms are stilled, where food and alcohol are plentiful, where bodies are healed and relationships restored.  

Take just one healing miracle – the healing of the blind man in John’s gospel.   Here the man is healed of his physical blindness – but the story is also told to show how Jesus has come to restore the sight, not just of a single person born physically blind, but for all so that we might see in a new way.   As Paul says in his letter to the Corinthian church, ‘For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known.’

I have not provided here an exhaustive list of the features of heaven that we can discover from the parables and miracles but it’s a lot better than I could do two weeks ago when my big concern was whether there was time and space in heaven.   I do think there are a lot of unknowables about heaven and these are two of them.   I argued two weeks ago that we cannot conceive of a heaven without time and space and I still think that is true.   But that surely isn’t the end of the matter.  There is also the justice in heaven, the freedom, the forgiveness, the healing, the celebration and joy to consider.   And last but certainly not least there is the certainty of being with God in heaven – which is to return to Charlie Bond’s parable and the collect for today which I’ll say again:

‘O God who has prepared for those who love you such good things as pass our understanding: pour into our hearts such love toward you that we, loving you above all things, may obtain your promises, which exceed all that we can desire; through Jesus Christ our Lord.’ Amen

Tuesday, 3 July 2012

Heaven


St Matthew’s Church, Oxford, 1st July 2012.  Readings: Revelation 21 and John 14: 1-6

This is the fourth in our series of sermons on the ‘last things’: death, judgement, Hell and Heaven.   You might think I have got the easy one: Heaven.   But in many ways I think the subject of Heaven is just as difficult as say the subject of Hell.  If we can get our heads around Hell, Heaven is relatively easy to comprehend.   But the reverse isn’t really the case.

In this sermon I want to pose some questions about Heaven.   I don’t intend to give you many answers.   For example I am not going to paint for you a rosy picture of heaven such as the one on the right.

Some of you might find that unsatisfactory but tough.   In the end we all have to make up our own minds about Heaven – just as we have to make our own minds up about God.   I, nor anyone else, can tell you what to believe about Heaven. 

But I also want to encourage your belief in Heaven.   I am rather assuming here that we all do believe in Heaven at least to some extent.   Forgive me if you don’t.   

Now we don’t say the Creed – the agreed statement of what Christians believe - very often at St Matthew’s – at least not at the 10.30 service.  However it is worth looking at it from time to time.   The Creed says two things about Heaven.

Firstly that Jesus has gone there:
‘And the third day he rose again according to the Scriptures,
And ascended into Heaven’.

And secondly that there is life after death:
                ‘And I look for the resurrection of the dead,
                And the life of the world to come.'

But it should be noted that the Creed says nothing more than this.   In saying the Creed we say nothing about what we think Heaven is like. 

In this sermon I am taking Heaven to be a time and place after death.   I know some people think Heaven is here and now – or at least can be glimpsed here and now – but this sermon is one of a series on the last things so by Heaven I mean the life of the world to come which is not Hell.  However I’ll come back to the possible timelessness and spacelessness of Heaven later.

So what does the Bible tell us about Heaven?   When choosing bible readings for today’s service I wasn’t exactly spoiled for choice.   To be frank descriptions of Heaven are few and far between in the bible – much less common than descriptions of Hell. 

I ended up with the reading from John’s gospel:  where Jesus is talking about Heaven as a house with many rooms.    And the reading from Revelation: which is John’s vision of Heaven as a rather strange but beautiful city.   And of course there is the notion of heaven as a banquet, a party, which I have talked about many times.

In wondering what to today I started by wondering what people really wanted to know about Heaven.   The first question I think people want the answer to is, ‘Does it really exist’?    The second is, ‘What is it like?’ and the third is, Am I going there?’  

So let’s start with: ‘Does it exist’?     I think we do rather have to assume that it does.   The Bible is surely pretty clear about this: even if it has little to say about what heave is like.  We affirm our belief in Heaven every time we say the Creed. 

Even John Lennon, in one of his best known songs, which begins with the words ‘Imagine there’s no Heaven,’ starts with the assumption there is a Heaven – either on the part of the singer or the person the song is being sung to. 

I am afraid I cannot prove to you that Heaven exists.   Just as I cannot prove that God exists.   We have to take the existence of Heaven on trust – because God has promised it.   This promise is a promise we know we can trust because Jesus has risen from the dead.    As Paul says in his first letter to the Corinthians, ‘If Christ has not been raised our teaching is in vain and your faith is in vain…But in fact Christ has been raised from the dead, the first fruits of those how have [died]’.

The second big question people seem to ask about Heaven is, ‘What is it like?’  
Now Heaven, almost by definition, is a nice place and somewhere God is.  When the Bible does talk about what Heaven is like it is clear at least on these two fronts.   Jesus says to his disciples ‘Let not your hearts be troubled…In my Father’s house there are many rooms’. John says ‘He {God] will dwell with them, and… there shall be no mourning nor crying nor pain any more’. 

We often used to sing a chorus at St Matthew’s which begins, ‘Heaven is a wonderful place, filled with glory and grace, I want to see my saviour’s face, Heaven is a wonderful place.’

But beyond the recognition of Heaven as where God is and that it’s a wonderful place we are likely to have many questions.   Let’s start with some seemingly trivial ones first.   

First will we have to wear white clothes?   Mrs. C.F. Alexander in one of her best known songs: Once in Royal David’s City, views Heaven as a place where we ‘like stars his children crowned, all in white shall wait around.’   She gets the notion of wearing white clothes from various verses in the Bible including Revelation 6: 11.  Do you think we will be wearing white clothes?

Next what will we do in Heaven?    The rather common – if now somewhat old fashioned idea - that we are going to spend a lot of time playing harps also comes from Revelation.   Revelation 14.2 says, ‘And I heard a voice from Heaven like the sound of sound of loud thunder; the voice I heard was like the sound of harpers playing on their harps, and they sing a new song before the throne.’  

But this verse hardly seems to justify the notion that we will all be continuously playing harps in Heaven.    But, if not, what we will be precisely doing?   Will we eat and drink in Heaven - as the song that we will sing after this sermon suggests?   Will we work, will we sleep?   The Bible is distinctly unclear.   Mrs CF Alexander’s suggestion that we will wait around sounds rather lame to me.

Interestingly – and as a bit of an aside – people seem to be distinctly uncertain about the last line of Once in Royal David’s City.   One version has it that, ‘All in white shall stand around’ and another that, ‘All in white shall be around’.  And indeed perhaps we will do nothing in Heaven but just be?

But surely the most pressing question people have about what Heaven is like is whether we will be able to meet our friends and family there?  This is clearly a big question people want to know, particularly when someone they love has just died.    What might usefully said to help us with this question?   Two things perhaps:

Firstly that being is surely relationship.  All agree that Heaven is where God is and being in Heaven means being with God: having a relationship with him.   But our relationship with God is not, and surely never will be, mutually exclusive of our relationships with other people.  If in Heaven we are to have a relationship with God then might we have relationships with other people as well?

Secondly our promise and hope of Heaven – as I said earlier –is based on the resurrection of Jesus.  When Jesus returned from the grave he was recognised by his friends – in some cases not immediately to be sure – but this surely too gives us confidence that in Heaven – we will keep our identities – at least to some degree – retaining the possibility of being recognised for who we are.

When thinking about what Heaven is like we run – I think – into a number of difficulties.   I have assumed up to this point in my sermon that Heaven is a place and also a place where time is in operation.   

But is it really?   In the old days people used to think of Heaven as a physical place - under the earth or beyond the stars – but in a physical place nonetheless.    Nowadays, knowing the Earth is not flat and how far distant the stars are, we no longer think of Heaven as an actual place.   Or do we?   It seems to me that we cannot imagine Heaven without thinking of it as somewhere we go, or can we?

And it is also nearly impossible to think about existence in places without also thinking about time.   When I said that many of us would like to know what we will be doing in Heaven you might have recalled that doing, as opposed to being, involves time.   We can do anything without time.   Playing a harp – for starters – requires time for it to be meaningful.   A tune involves a sequence of notes played over a period of time.   

Without time that tune could only be a single note infinitely short in duration.   Having a conversation with someone we love involves a sequence of exchanges over a period of time.   A common notion of Heaven is that it is everlasting.   But if for God there is no time then is there really time in Heaven? 

It seems to me that all visions of Heaven necessarily involve seeing it as located in space in time.   One of my reasons for thinking this is that Jesus both in his earthly life and in his risen life was located in time and space.   

The incarnation means that the physical body, located in time and space, is made holy.  In the end our physical body may be transformed but must retain its physical connection with time and space.  Jesus talks about Heaven as a house with many rooms and that he is going there to prepare a place there and then come back.  In other words that Heaven is a physical location located in time.  This perhaps sounds shocking to our modern ears – or would do so if the words had not begun to be taken as a sort of metaphor or parable.

St John’s vision of a new Heaven in Revelation rather plays with the notion of space and time.   Revelation seems to have a view of time as circular or at least cyclical rather than linear and where the events are set seems indistinct.  But John’s Heaven is not entirely timeless and spaceless.

A vision of Heaven that I particularly like and commend is that to be found in CS Lewis’s book The Great Divorce.   In this fantasy the narrator takes a bus trip from Hell to Heaven.   The inhabitants of Hell can make this trip if they want and stay in Heaven as long as they like if they choose to.   Most of the travellers on the bus choose to go back to Hell but some stay.  Lewis’ vision of Heaven is of a land where the grass hurts the feet of the people from Hell because it is so real and where the inhabitants are shining spirits who are on a journey from the plane (where the bus from Hell lets off its passengers) to the mountains where God is.  Lewis’ vision of Heaven is located firmly in time and space – albeit on a grand scale.   For instance he talks about Hell being a grain of sand down a crack of the earth of Heaven.     

The third big question about Heaven that I think most people want to know is, ‘If it exists, am I going there? I cannot presume to answer this for you.   All I can say is that God has promised us Heaven if only we can grasp that promise. 

Now a promise is a performative form of speech.   I have talked before about the difference between descriptive words and peformative words.   Descriptive words – if true - just reflects the world like a mirror.  Performative words if true change the world.   There is a vast difference between me saying Heaven is like this - say a place with grass and mountains - and God saying I promise you Heaven.    The first set of words changes nothing and may even be untrue, the second set of words changes matters completely.   But God’s promise of Heaven needs us – to whom he is making the promise – to trust that promise.   We need to engage with God’s performative words if they are to become true.

Since I have been using lines of songs to illustrate different perspectives on Heaven, here is one last song relating to the question of how we get to Heaven.   There is a song many of used to sing around campfires as children which began, ‘You'll never get to Heaven In an old Ford car 'cos an old Ford car Won't get that far.‘    And there was another verse which ran: ’You'll never get to Heaven in a Playtex bra ‘cos a Playtex bra. won't stretch that far.’   This song reminds us that in the end, not only can we not really know what Heaven is like, but we cannot get there under our own steam either.   We just have to trust in God to prepare a place for us there.   Any provisional description of what Heaven is like is less important than God’s promise of its existence.

So to summarise what I have said.   There are, I think, three big questions about Heaven:  The first is, ‘Does it really exist’?    The second is, ‘What is it like?’    The third is: ‘Am I going there?’    Although I said I wasn’t going to supply many answers to questions, my answers – in short - to these questions are:  Yes to the first, yes Heaven does really exist.  However we can’t really answer the second - ‘What is Heaven like?’ - beyond the promise that God will be there and it will be a good place to be.   And my answer to the third?  Well yes I hope I am going there, and I hope you are coming with me.

Monday, 4 June 2012

A quarter of a pint of beer a day?

My take on the media reporting of our recent paper on alcohol and health



Our paper modelling the costs and benefits to health of alcohol consumption in England came out last week.   It was widely covered by the media including the News Quiz on Radio 4 where the panellists had a good laugh at the findings of the research.   Our paper shows that the optimum average consumption level for drinkers in this country is about 5g/day (about half a unit) and this would avert or delay about 4600 deaths per year.   I should emphasise that this paper describes what is and makes some tentative conclusions about what should be the case.   There has been little criticism of the methods for, and results of, the paper but much derision at the supposed conclusions.

There is a line in the paper that reads:  “On this basis, we recommend that the public health target for alcohol consumption in England should be to reduce median alcohol consumption to half a unit per day for both men and women.”    We should, perhaps, have been clearer about what we meant by ‘a public health target’.   We meant a target level for the whole population of England and NOT a target for any one individual.   By median intake we meant the average for everyone not the individual’s average intake. 

The paper got reported in the press with such headlines as ‘Cut alcohol intake to just a quarter pint of beer a day, experts advise’ (Guardian) and ‘Don't drink more than quarter of a pint a DAY’ (Daily Mail).   It might sound quibbling but we weren’t advising people to drink just quarter of a pint a day.   What we were trying to say was that if people ON AVERAGE drank quarter of a pint a day the whole population would be healthier.   And if the Government was to advise people about their drinking then they should tell them the truth i.e. that alcohol is good for them in small amounts but that anything over quarter a pint is (on average) harmful.  

The Guardian and Mail clearly failed to understand what we were getting at but some other newspapers did seem to understand.   For example the Telegraph’s headline was ‘ Sticking to a quarter pint of beer a day would save thousands of lives’  and BBC Online’s headline was ‘Reducing alcohol to half a unit a day saves lives’.  These headlines –if somewhat imprecise - better capture what our paper says and both wisely avoid the issue of what the public should be advised on the basis of our research.  

Why did the Guardian claim that we – the expert authors of the paper - were advising people to drink just a quarter a pint of beer a day?   We didn’t speak to the journalist in question and this was just sloppy journalism.   The Telegraph article, for example, doesn’t anywhere suggest that we were advising the public anything.  

However it would be disingenuous of us to pretend that we weren’t hoping that our research would have some effect on the public and their view of alcohol.  And we did say in the paper that, “we recommend that the public health target for alcohol consumption in England should be to reduce median alcohol consumption to half a unit per day for both men and women.”   Furthermore there is clearly some relationship between what would be good for the population and what individuals should individually drink if their health is to be optimised.

But the paper does not address the question of how our epidemiological research should be translated into advice to the public.   Perhaps we should have been clearer in that regard.   How results such as ours should be used to inform advice to the public should be the subject of future investigation – not necessarily by us.   But there are two things that might be said in a preliminary sort of way. 

Firstly, as some commentators have pointed out, a median intake of half a unit a day is even theoretically compatible with the Government’s ‘recommended daily limits’ of 3-4 units a day for men and 2-3 units a day for women - for, as Andrew Sales points out in the comments on our paper at BMJ Open ‘at this level of population consumption [an average of half a unit a day] the model…allows for individual consumptions at much higher level.’   (If the median is half a unit then 50% of people can afford to drink more than a half a unit.) 

Note that the Government does not says that 3-4 units for men/2-3 units for women is optimal or even safe as, for example, the Daily Mail describes the Government’s ‘recommended daily limit’.  In fact the Government says that ‘There's no guaranteed safe level of drinking, but if you drink less than the recommended daily limits, the risks of harming your health are low’.   Well it depends on what you mean by ‘low’.   I would argue that the risk of drinking 2-4 units is hardly ‘low’ but my ‘low’ may not be their ‘low’.   Furthermore I question whether 2-4 units should be ‘recommended’.   What is to be ‘recommended’ about this ‘limit’?

Secondly it is not clear – as David Spiegelhalter has pointed out in a rather good commentary on our paper – that what the public should be advised is what would absolutely minimise their risk of ill health.   For some other bits of public health advice the Government doesn’t attempt to advise what would be ideal but what would be realistic.   For instance eating 5 portions of fruit and vegetables is not the best we could do.   In Greece they eat around 10 portions of fruit and vegetables (on average) each day and in consequence Greece’s cardiovascular disease rates are lower than ours.   The Government’s 5–a-day message was designed to be a realistic target for individuals and the population not what we should ideally eat.  On the other hand (contra Spiegelhalter) with other public health advice the Government does recommend to the public what would absolutely minimise their risk.   Take smoking for instance.  Here the advice is to quit not just cut down.

So has our paper and the media coverage helped or hindered the confusion about the effects of alcohol consumption on health and how much we should drink.   I am hoping that when the dust has settled, its overall contribution e.g. to the Government’s currentreview of its alcohol guidelines, might be helpful.  As the Commons Science and Technology Committee says these are confusing.   On a personal note I am not pleased by the results of our research.   I was hoping that alcohol might have been better for my health.

Wednesday, 30 May 2012

A sermon for Pentecost


Acts 2: 1-12; John 13: 12-31,  27th May 2012,

St Matthew’s, Oxford
 

The celebration of Pentecost – provides us with an opportunity of thinking about the Holy Spirit.   And the best book on that subject is for me John V. Taylor’s ‘The Go-Between God’.   Even the title says such a lot.   By the ‘Go-Between God’ Taylor means and I quote from the Introduction ‘The Holy Spirit is he who makes one aware of the other, who gives one to the other’.   By this he means, for example, that the Holy Spirit is he who makes God the Son aware of God the Father and vice versa but also that the Holy Spirit is he who makes human beings aware of God and it is this essential feature of the Holy Spirit that I want to talk about today. 

Pentecost is the time in the church year when we celebrate the coming of the Holy Spirit – so a bit like Christmas – when we celebrate the coming of the coming of Jesus – God the Son – into the world.   Of course we now understand that just as God the Son pre-existed before his incarnation so we believe that God the Holy Spirit was always present even at the Creation.   Still it is at Pentecost that we remember the gift of the Holy Spirit to the first disciples, and in particular the way that Luke describes the first manifestation of this gift on a specific occasion 50  - pente - days after the resurrection. 

Some things to note about Luke’s account:  Firstly that it seems to differ from John’s account.   In John’s gospel Jesus certainly promises that the Holy Spirit will come to the disciples after he has left them.   He tells them many things about this Comforter - as the Spirit is described in the translation of that bit of John’s gospel we heard just now – a section of Jesus’ farewell speech to his disciples.   In John’s gospel Jesus breaths the Holy Spirit on them on Easter Sunday night.  In Luke’s account the risen Jesus promises to send the Holy Spirit to them but the Holy Spirit arrives only after Jesus has ascended into Heaven.

However it is notable that in both accounts the Spirit is given to the disciples when they are all together in one room and this seems to me important.   The Sprit is not given to individuals individually but to the group collectively.  It/he/she is given when people gather together for some special purpose in one place not when they are going about their every-day business on their own.

These two accounts of the disciples’ first experience of the Holy Spirit underline for me the fact that our experience of God is always collective.   If I had been born in a Moslem country I would now be a Moslem and my experience of God would be as a Moslem – there seems no getting away from this.   My experience of God is not an act of will on my part.   It is a gift.

Note , too, that in both Luke’s and John’s accounts of ‘Pentecost’ the Spirit is given to the disciples to empower them to do things they would not otherwise be able to do.   In John’s account – when Jesus breaths the Holy Spirit into the disciples he says to them that ‘If you forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven, if you retain the sins of any they are retained’   In Luke’s account, when the Holy Spirit the disciples are empowered to speak in other languages and to preach the gospel.

But surely the most striking thing about Luke’s account of the advent of the Holy Spirit, and indeed Luke’s description of the actions of the Holy Spirit later in Acts, is I think that the disciples experience its presence in a way most of us Christians – at least in this county - do not do so today.   The Spirit enables them to do things like preach the gospel in foreign tongues, to prophecy, to heal people, etc.   But the spirit is also ‘experienced’, felt as a living presence.   Luke underlines this point in the reading we heard just now by talking about a sound like a rushing wind and the appearance of ‘tongues as of fire’.  Note that Luke doesn’t say that the Sprit was actually wind or fire but that this is what it/he/she felt like to the disciples.

Now I confess I have never experienced the Holy Spirit in that way.   My experience of God and his Holy Spirit seems to me much less dramatic, more muted.   I have on occasion felt the presence of God while I have been praying: but this has been more of a warm feeling than a burning fire.   I have heard God at times but more in a voice which sounded suspiciously like my own rather than a rushing wind.

I have experienced that gift of the Holy Spirit – healing – on at least two occasions that I can think of in a way that made me, still makes me feel profoundly grateful.   But I have never spoken in tongues – that form of ecstatic speech which some people – even some people amongst the congregation of St Matthew’s– are able to express their praise of God.  

Now – when I said that Luke’s account of the advent and subsequent action of the Holy Spirit, is somewhat alien to my experience, it seems impossible to deny that in some churches – particularly those that describe themselves as Pentecostal, after the day we are celebrating today, the experience of the Holy Spirit is much more akin to that of the first disciples, according to Luke’s account, than to mine.

My temptation in the face of the ‘Pentecostals’ experience is either to deny its authenticity or to feel jealous.   But it is surely wrong to question its validity.  As Taylor says, ‘The whole weight of New Testament evidence endorses the central affirmation of the Pentecostalists that the gift of the Holy Spirit transforms and intensifies the quality of human life and that this is a fact of experience in the lives of [some] Christians.   The longing of thousands of Christians to recover what they feel instinctively their faith promises them is what underlies the whole movement.’

I am convinced of this longing that Taylor talks of.   I think many people long to experience God in their lives in the way that seems to have been the experience of the early Christians.   And indeed we can see that this experience – or something like it – seems given to some Christians today. 

But it’s not given to all of us.  Taylor points out that while Luke may place a lot of emphasis upon the direct communications which the apostles received from the Holy Spirit and on the gifts of healing, prophecy and speaking in tongues, in the Epistles as a whole this emphasis is not so pronounced, and although there are plenty of references to gifts of healing, prophecy and so on, life in the Holy Spirit is associated mainly with a new relation to God expressed in the words ‘sonship’ and ’liberty’ and in a new degree of love, of life-for others.

So perhaps those of us who do not experience the Holy Spirit as a rushing wind or as tongues of fire, or who do not have gifts of the Spirit such as the gift of speaking in ‘tongues’ or of prophecy or who have never experienced healing can feel reassured by, for example, Paul’s admonishment to the Corinthians that they should view the possession of gifts of tongues, of healing, etc as less important than a life in the Spirit where faith, hope and in particular love abound.   However that’s as maybe, it doesn’t lessen my longing, at least, for a more intense experience of God that does not seem given to me.   In other words I am jealous of the Pentecostalists.

What is going on here?   It is somehow our fault when we do not experience the Holy Spirit as others have or do.   No, I do not think it is a matter of fault as we might be tempted to think.   The Holy Spirit is not something we can command.   Jesus tells Nicodemus, ‘The Sprit blows where it wills, and you hear the sound of it, but you do not know whence it comes or whither it goes.’

And if Taylor is right and ‘The Holy Spirit is he who makes us aware of God’ then we are surely made aware of God to different degrees and in different ways depending on our character but also our circumstances.   As I said at the beginning of this sermon, the Holy Spirit comes to groups not to individuals.  ‘Where two or three are gathered together in my name there am I in the midst of them.’   Perhaps then it is the character and circumstances of the group to which we belong (our church) that determines how we experience God.  I was not brought up in a Pentecostal church I cannot now experience God as the Pentecostalists do.  For me, and perhaps for you, I must discover and then experience God in other ways.

We need to remind ourselves that God has primarily made his presence known in the person of Jesus and that it is  he who comes to us not we to him.   It is in the end up to God how he makes us aware of himself.   But he promises – as Jesus did – to his disciples as recorded in John’s gospel ‘I will not leave you desolate, I will come to you.’   And as the risen Jesus tells his disciples in the last words of Matthew’s gospel.  "I will be with you always, even till the end of time....."